Home » Broadband Speed »Public Policy & Gov't » Currently Reading:

America’s Mediocrity in Broadband Continues – Now Down to 28th in the World in Speed Ranking

Phillip Dampier August 25, 2009 Broadband Speed, Public Policy & Gov't 6 Comments

The Communications Workers of America released their 2009 Report on Internet Speeds in All 50 States, and the results show the United States continuing to lag well behind other nations in providing citizens with advanced, fast, and affordable connections to the Internet.  Little improvement has been made in the past year, when CWA released its 2008 findings. (Stop the Cap! reader Dave passed along word the report was in.)

The average download speed for the nation was 5.1 megabits per second (mbps) and the average upload speed was 1.1 mbps. This was only a nine-tenths of a megabit per second increase (from 4.2 mbps to 5.1 mbps) since last year. At this rate, it will take the United States 15 years to catch up with current Internet speeds in South Korea. And when compared to the rest of the world, the United States ranks 28th in average Internet connection speeds.

behind

The CWA does have an interest in this fight.  It’s a labor union whose members work for many of the nation’s telecommunications providers.  CWA seeks a national broadband strategy that just happens to fall in line with the interests of consumers — increased speeds, more rural broadband expansion, more affordable access, and Net Neutrality protections.  CWA doesn’t take a formal position on Internet Overcharging schemes like usage caps, at least not yet.

The report measured broadband speed based on more than 400,000 Americans who voluntarily participated in a speed test offered on the Speed Matters website.  The results were collected and covered a significant part of the country, illustrating real world results of ordinary consumers, not simply the speeds touted by broadband providers in marketing materials.

The CWA report calls out the inadequacy of the deregulated free market approach to deliver broadband service consistently to all Americans.  In fact, the disparity of access and the tiny incremental upgrades in speed suggest it will take at least 15 years for the United States to match the speeds enjoyed today in South Korea, which can rightly be called a world leader in broadband even while this country cannot.

South Koreans enjoy an average connection speed of 20.4Mbps (four times faster than the United States).  Japan provides residents with 15.8Mbps, Sweden offers 12.8Mbps, the Netherlands 11Mbps, and 24 others who do a better job at delivering speedy broadband than their American counterparts.

Broadband remains too expensive for the slow service we enjoy today.  That promotes a digital divide between those affluent enough to afford broadband service and those who are struggling to make ends meet (88% of those earning more than $100,000 a year have service in their homes, while just 35% of those earning under $20,000 subscribe).

Another problem highlighted in the report is the ongoing problem of rural broadband access.  While 67% of urban and suburban residents subscribe to broadband, only 46% of rural households do, assuming they can even obtain service.

Rural areas are by far the most likely to encounter slow service, typically 1-3Mbps provided by DSL from the local phone company.

speed state

Until 2009, the United States was the only industrialized country in the world without a national broadband plan.  The Federal Communications Commission is expected to release one shortly, but only time will tell whether the plan will primarily benefit consumers or the special interests, including providers seeking to protect their monopoly or duopoly market position, and get taxpayer dollars to finance broadband projects that provide slow and expensive service to consumers.

apps

The CWA has some recommendations:

Governmental action — in partnership with the private sector — is essential to stimulate broadband investment and adoption. Other countries are far ahead of us. It is time for the United States to take action.

  • Universality.  Just as government policies helped bring affordable telephone service to everyone, our policies should ensure that every individual, family, business, and community has access to and can use high speed Internet at a price they can afford — regardless of their income or geographic location.
  • High Speed.  Speed matters on the Internet. U.S. policies should promote higher Internet speeds and higher capacity networks. The United States should adopt policies to get us to 10 megabits per second upstream and 1 megabit per second downstream by 2010. New benchmarks in succeeding years should expand the number of households capable of sending and receiving multiple channel high-definition video and reach the global standard of 100 mbps.
  • Open Internet.  We must protect free speech on the Internet so that people are able to go to the websites they want and download or upload what they want when they want on the Internet. There should be no degradation of service or censoring any lawful content on the Internet. At the same time, reasonable network management is necessary to preserve an effective and open Internet. Most important, building high-capacity networks will ensure that all Americans have fast, open access to all content on the Internet.
  • Consumer Protections and Good Jobs.  Public policies should include consumer and worker protections, should support the growth of good, career jobs, and require the public reporting of deployment, actual speed, price, and service.

Below the jump, we’ve assembled a selection of maps and graphics showing where broadband is today in three of states with our largest reader base — New York, Texas, and North Carolina.

New York

ny quick

nycoverage

Texas

texasstat

texasmap

North Carolina

ncquick

ncmap

key

Currently there are 6 comments on this Article:

  1. jr says:

    The media demonize other countries so we won’t travel there and see how badly we’re getting ripped off by their advertisers

  2. Ian L says:

    Stats are well and good…unless they aren’t.

    For example my brand-new Comcast Ultra DOCSIS 3 connection, boasting a whopping 22 Mbps of download speed (roughly 31.5 Mbps with PowerBoost on) registers only around 18.5 Mbps on the SpeedMatters test. It’s not my end that’s the problem here; speed tests elsewhere (including ones that aren’t run by Comcast) report 22+ Mbps.

    On uploads SpeedMatters similarly falls short; I get 11.5 Mbps or so with PowerBoost to other speed test sites (sometimes closer to 8 Mbps) however SpeedMatters puts me below 7.

    Additionally the folks at SpeedMatters are using a TINY sample size for their connection tests; 400,000 connections is less than 1% of the number of connections in the US, assuming no user tested twice. More to this, SpeedMatters includes in their results tests in areas where only one person in a given zip code took the test. I’d say that five different IPs per zip should be required to make any sort of educated guess about that location’s real internet speeds.

    I would trust Speedtest.net more with speed rankings, and there we compare a litle more favorably. The US average in that location is 6.79 Mbps down, 1.51 Mbps up. Granted, Speedtest.net likely has an upward bias on speed rankings, but I’d trust their dozens of millions of results versus SpeedMatters’ 400k. Plus, Speedtest.net still shows that the connectivity situation in the US isn’t too rosy; we’re 27th on the list by download speed, 28th by upload speed.

    To get to the top of the list the average connection speed would have to rise to 21 Mbps down, 9 Mbps up, something that’s very doable with even DOCSIS 2.0 systems if managed correctly, though DOCSIS 3 and fiber leave a whole lot more headroom.

    Of course, to *really* get some accurate stats, check with Akamai. They serve enough content to have a few fingers on the pulse of the internet, so I’d trust their information more than others’. No upward bias there since they serve pretty much every type of content online. I’d put my trust in those results, since to my knowledge they’re completely unbiased.

    Not that I don’t want 25 Mbps down, 15 Mbps up (or better) fiber available everywhere. I just want any speed results representing the nation to be accurate.

    • This is why the broadband mapping project is so critical to any national broadband strategy. And we’ve all seen where that has been going — right into the hands of big telecom companies who have major influence over one of the largest and most successful mappers around – Connected Nation.

      They’ve been tailor-made to win state mapping contracts, in part thanks to Sen. Dick Durbin (D-Illinois), who creatively wrote language in the authorizing legislation that effectively funnels mapping grant money only to well-connected non profits like CN.

      Instead of the kind of fine grade map information, including pricing, speed, competition, and access (right down the street level), we end up with maps like the one CN produced for Kentucky which showed the state had 100% broadband coverage – a ludicrous conclusion.

      I’d actually trust CWA’s findings over that of Connected Nation, because it at least depicts coverage and speed.

      • Ian L says:

        I’d trust the CWA before CN but both have a bias. They just run in opposite directions.

        Mapping is very important, you’re absolutely right. However even CWA’s method isn’t so hot because the sample size is pathetically small.

        My idea: if the cable/DSL companies don’t readily give boundary markers for their systems, grab a list of valid addresses (the post office has those, right?) and plug ‘n’ chug with each respective company’s qualification tool. Either you’ll get results that are as accurate as those companies have (not 100%, but 99% at least) or you’ll get the companies annoyed enough to provide data voluntarily.

        Of course, for the smaller companies quo don’t have prequal pages the situation will be a bit different, however between Verizon, AT&T, Qwest, Comcast, TWC, Charter, Insight, CableOne, etc. (who do have such a tool) you’re going to cover a lot of ground.

  3. [...] Americans should have been this country’s goal for today set ten years ago.  Presently, the U.S. is so far behind the rest of the developed world in broadband penetration and speed that the FCC’s seemingly robust recommendations will only [...]

  4. [...] to 100 million people in the next 10 years), it’s clear that if the U.S. wants to keep up with the rest of the world both technologically and economically, it’s going to have to commit to FTTH technology. [...]

Search This Site:

Contributions:

Recent Comments:

  • Rasputin1357: Why can't we bring back tar and feathering? This jackass looks to be the perfect candidate for that treatment!...
  • Terry: This makes it look as if you don't understand business. The content producer sets their asking price. The delivery provider negotiates the price to wh...
  • Dave Hancock: Phillip, one thing that you said peaked my interest: "Subscribers on Time Warner Cable’s blog keep coming up with an innovative idea to solve thes...
  • Jason!: Am I surprised? No, I am not surprised....
  • jr: CEOs need to make 8 figures...
  • DM: I hate hearing statements like this because this has been the cable industry’s exact attitude for the past five years. Regarding internet services,...
  • Jeremy: That's their whole plan so they can justify ripping off consumers with lousy bandwidth and caps....
  • Uncle Ken: Just great/ If what Kent says is true we will drop to the bottom of the rest of the earth and be back on dial up all in the name of stock holders. M...
  • Earl Cooley III: They should pay the various channels whatever fees they want, and finance it by dramatically slashing executive compensation, using the extra money le...
  • Phillip Dampier: In other words, some automated test procedure is being run on a periodic basis that resets your line speeds lower (how many have ever gotten faster sp...
  • Zaii: I've been having this issue for months now. I had 1792 d/l for years rock solid connection then I got "optimized" to 1504. Contacted Verizon direc...
  • Phillip Dampier: In Australia or New Zealand, where flat rate broadband was around only very briefly back when "online streaming" meant a low bitrate Real Audio stream...

Your Account: