Home » AT&T »Canada »Internet Overcharging » Currently Reading:

The AT&T Huge Bill Problem (Again): Credit for One, Overcharges for Everyone Else

Phillip Dampier June 29, 2009 AT&T, Canada, Internet Overcharging 3 Comments
No Myth: AT&T Huge Wireless Data Bills

No Myth: AT&T Huge Wireless Data Bills

In between the wall-to-wall coverage of the passing of Michael Jackson last week, Stop the Cap! reader Lou discovered Twitter was all-a-tweet about yet another person who got stuck with an enormous mobile data bill from AT&T Mobility.  This time it was Mythbusters’ Adam Savage, who spent five days in Montreal and discovered the most expensive part of the trip was the $11,000 bill from AT&T.

The story here isn’t really about AT&T’s math, or the remarkably expensive Canadian data roaming rate of $0.015 per kilobyte, it’s the fact AT&T will let your bill run into the ionosphere before alerting you, or giving you the option to automatically shut yourself off before you go over a plan limit.

Savage’s tweet to his 50,000 followers all but guaranteed a rapid response (and credit) from AT&T for the $11,000 in fees charged to his account (and they turned his phone back on.)  Unfortunately, company policies remain unchanged, leaving those who encounter similar kinds of overlimit fees who don’t have tens of thousands of followers on Twitter, stuck paying those bills or begging for credit.

AT&T should automatically notify any customer entering into a roaming area with a text message explaining the rates and fees charged when inside that roaming area.  Customers should have the right to choose a setting for their account that best meets their needs:

  1. No roaming access/No overlimit fees: This would suspend service on your phone automatically until you contacted AT&T to remove it at your request;
  2. No Overcharges: This would turn your service off when your plan limit is reached, requiring the customer to opt-in to any overlimit fees;
  3. Free and Open: The current standard — roaming and overlimit rates apply automatically.

AT&T claims it will send a text message and/or contact customers who substantially exceed their normal usage, but there has been scant evidence that policy is applied uniformly.  Customers should have the right to make their own choices about their wireless usage, and the responsibility to select an option that best protects them from the heart attack in the mail, a/k/a the bill.




Share

Other stories of interest:

  1. Texas Customer Goes to War With Time Warner Cable & AT&T Over Internet Overcharging After Getting Huge Bill
  2. Wireless Data Plan Cap Relief? Sort Of
  3. Cogeco Wants $2.50/GB in Overlimit Fees – The Gravy Train Rides On North of the Border
  4. AT&T’s “Grandma” Analogy Upsets Grandmothers – They Don’t Want Overcharges Either
  5. Wireless Broadband: A Bountiful Garden of Consumer Choice, Pricing, & Plans… Not

Currently there are 3 comments on this Article:

  1. preventCAPS says:

    I would love to see Mythbusters tackel the broadband exaflod idea…

    • Smith6612 says:

      Now that’d be something worth watching TV for and interesting as well. I’ve barely watched any TV since Stargate got canceled on Sci-Fi.

      • preventCAPS says:

        Unfortunately, I’m not sure what testing they could do that would result in visually catostrophic disasters… Maybe they could smoke a router or get Buster to be an irritaded, angry, flailing consumer!

Search This Site:

Contributions:

Recent Comments:

  • Sean: A phone company says having customers with working phones is a harmful business model? WTH?...
  • txpatriot: Have any of those mayors asked whether Marriott has built luxury hotels in those depressed areas, or why Cadillac hasn't opened car dealerships in tho...
  • txpatriot: I love it -- this article has NOTHING to do with caps, broadband or anything else related to "Promoting Better Broadband, Fighting Data Caps, Usage-Ba...
  • Bill: It doesn't exactly sound like Verizon is the victim in this article: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/bruce-kushnick/the-great-verizon-fios-ripoff_b_1...
  • txpatriot: Scott here's another example, this time by a start-up which by definition is somewhat smaller than google: http://www.nytimes.com/2012/05/23/techno...
  • txpatriot: Phillip, I get that you don't like the VZ co-marketing deal, but can we stick to the subject? The 400 word article you wrote was about CABLE companie...
  • txpatriot: Scott, it takes only one counterexample to disprove a general claim. And surely you're not suggesting that only a company as big as google could ...
  • Scott: I'm afraid I don't share your optimism when you're have to point out a company with a market cap of nearly 200 billion dollars paying a 3rd party to b...
  • Phillip Dampier: In the context of the co-marketing agreement between the cable industry and the nation's biggest wireless operator (Verizon Wireless), building out Wi...
  • txpatriot: Scott, I didn't respond to your comments on barriers to entry. I agree that incumbents have significant advantages as "first-movers". But incumb...
  • txpatriot: "The consumer advocacy group Public Knowledge on Monday criticized an announcement by a group of major cable companies that their customers would now ...
  • George: Schenectady has some of the poorest population in the entire upstate region and they have FiOS. This is a load of bunk. The reason for the lack of exp...

Your Account: