Home » FairPoint » Currently Reading:

Special Report: The Lessons of FairPoint – A Tragedy in New England – Part Nine

Phillip Dampier June 5, 2009 FairPoint 1 Comment

“I can walk outside of this building and touch FairPoint, and they were telling me back in February that they couldn’t find my building!”

It takes a special kind of incompetence to run a telephone company into the ground and allow customers to achieve a level of exasperation unparalleled in history.  Well beyond a month after the “transfer” from Verizon to FairPoint, the company was literally tearing up the fabric of New England business customers, unable to obtain telephone service despite weeks of trying, as WCAX discovered up in White River Junction, Vermont:

http://www.phillipdampier.com/video/WCAX Burlington Problems Continue for Some 3-15-09.flv

Nearly a month without e-mail, Internet service interruptions, and six week waits before a repair or installation truck bothers to show up in your driveway.  Life under FairPoint this past spring was hardly a picnic.  Comcast ran a veritable festival of advertising telling customers there was an alternative, and where cable was available, they did a good business picking up customers fleeing FairPoint’s nightmarish service.

Up in Maine, business customers arriving for work started to discover their phone lines had been disconnected without warning, potentially costing them thousands in dollars of lost business when customers dialing their numbers heard “this number has been disconnected” in response.

How could this happen?  WCSH in Portland finds out:

http://www.phillipdampier.com/video/WCSH Portland FairPoint Business Customers Angry 02-13-09.flv

“You’re on hold for infinity.”  Over a month after the transfer of service, customers couldn’t get virtually anything from FairPoint.  Dr. Jon Bryan, a university professor, compared FairPoint with a third world phone company.  He waited more than 25 hours on hold before being able to reach a representative, as WMUR reports:

http://www.phillipdampier.com/video/WMUR Manchester Fairpoint Customers Report Problems With Phone Service 3-10-09.flv

The Excuse-o-Matic damage control response from FairPoint was more or less the same empty promises over and over again.  Telling customers “they were warned” is hardly adequate.  WMUR found one customer still waiting for a service call set up for January 23rd still not fulfilled by March 5th.  In Rochester, one customer reported essentially unusable phone and Internet service for more than a month.

http://www.phillipdampier.com/video/WMUR Manchester Customers Continue To Report Problems With Fairpoint 3-13-09.flv




Share

Other stories of interest:

  1. Special Report: The Lessons of FairPoint – A Tragedy in New England – Part Eight
  2. Special Report: The Lessons of FairPoint – A Tragedy in New England – Part Seven
  3. Special Report: The Lessons of FairPoint – A Tragedy in New England – Part Three
  4. Special Report: The Lessons of FairPoint – A Tragedy in New England – Part Six
  5. Special Report: The Lessons of FairPoint – A Tragedy in New England – Part Five

Currently there is 1 comment on this Article:

  1. [...] weeks without service, $400 phone bills for service long since canceled, company technicians that cannot find the customer even when they are located right next door to the phone company, and broken promise after broken promise [...]

Search This Site:

Contributions:

Recent Comments:

  • Sean: A phone company says having customers with working phones is a harmful business model? WTH?...
  • txpatriot: Have any of those mayors asked whether Marriott has built luxury hotels in those depressed areas, or why Cadillac hasn't opened car dealerships in tho...
  • txpatriot: I love it -- this article has NOTHING to do with caps, broadband or anything else related to "Promoting Better Broadband, Fighting Data Caps, Usage-Ba...
  • Bill: It doesn't exactly sound like Verizon is the victim in this article: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/bruce-kushnick/the-great-verizon-fios-ripoff_b_1...
  • txpatriot: Scott here's another example, this time by a start-up which by definition is somewhat smaller than google: http://www.nytimes.com/2012/05/23/techno...
  • txpatriot: Phillip, I get that you don't like the VZ co-marketing deal, but can we stick to the subject? The 400 word article you wrote was about CABLE companie...
  • txpatriot: Scott, it takes only one counterexample to disprove a general claim. And surely you're not suggesting that only a company as big as google could ...
  • Scott: I'm afraid I don't share your optimism when you're have to point out a company with a market cap of nearly 200 billion dollars paying a 3rd party to b...
  • Phillip Dampier: In the context of the co-marketing agreement between the cable industry and the nation's biggest wireless operator (Verizon Wireless), building out Wi...
  • txpatriot: Scott, I didn't respond to your comments on barriers to entry. I agree that incumbents have significant advantages as "first-movers". But incumb...
  • txpatriot: "The consumer advocacy group Public Knowledge on Monday criticized an announcement by a group of major cable companies that their customers would now ...
  • George: Schenectady has some of the poorest population in the entire upstate region and they have FiOS. This is a load of bunk. The reason for the lack of exp...

Your Account: