Home » Time Warner Cable » Currently Reading:

Telecom Analyst: Cap ‘n Tier “Is Going to Happen”

Phillip Dampier June 2, 2009 Time Warner Cable 2 Comments

Craig Moffett, cable and telecom analyst at Sanford C. Bernstein & Company, is back rallying for consumption based billing, dismissing accusations it represents a stealth rate increase.  Moffett characterized Time Warner Cable’s negative experience as only a temporary setback.

Moffett told The Wall Street Journal:

“Look, there’s a real argument for some form of consumption-based billing, and it’s going to happen,” he said. “Time Warner got the pricing wrong, it got the P.R. wrong, but this is not some kind of stealth price increase. They’ve been clear – they don’t want to discourage the use of the [broadband] product, but they have be able to manage the increased use of bandwidth that goes with Web-based video.”

In the same article, however, Moffett had nothing but praise for attempts to control web video so that only authenticated cable TV subscribers get access, for a price.  Bandwidth caps and limits help discourage online video consumption among subscribers concerned about exceeding monthly limits, particularly those set at paltry levels that virtually assure video watchers exceed them.

One topic addressed at the Bernstein conference was “TV Everywhere,” the initiative spearheaded by Time Warner Cable to make sure that online viewing of cable programs is only available to consumers who subscribe to video service provided by a cable, satellite or telephone company.

Cable operators say that if they’re going to pay millions of dollars in fees to film and TV studios in exchange for the right to air their programs, those studios shouldn’t turn around and offer the same shows over the Web for free.

Moffett says that while there “are a lot of specifics” to be worked out, including how to authenticate paid video subscribers on the Web without hassle, “TV Everywhere” is a “very positive step for operators and programmers, because it’s at least some attempt at a strategic alignment, rather than for each side to go it alone, which is what they’ve done traditionally.”

The broader scope of the Journal article was to measure Wall Street’s reaction to cable stocks in general.  Investors are looking for assurances of significant returns, something more difficult to achieve in a problematic economy.  Stop the Cap! contends that changing the business model of cable broadband with Cap ‘n Tier billing like Time Warner Cable tested, is precisely aimed at increasing those returns, particularly in markets where limited or insufficient competition holds customers virtually hostage to the cable provider.




Share

Other stories of interest:

  1. Time Warner Cable Ends Cap ‘n Tier “Trial” in Beaumont
  2. News 14 Carolina: We’ll Help Customers Decide What Tier They Belong In
  3. Time Warner Cable CEO Still Loves Cap ‘n Tier Approach to Internet Billing
  4. Radio Havana: Soaking In The Propaganda On TW’s Twitter Channels & An Update On That 50/5 $99 Tier
  5. WOAI San Antonio – Time Warner Customers Learn of the New 1GB Granny Tier

Currently there are 2 comments on this Article:

  1. jr says:

    “only millionaires deserve to go online”-Craig Moffett

  2. SS says:

    At least they’re being honest about their intentions to be anti-competitive and stop consumer choice in the marketplace by bundling and forcing broadband users to buy into expensive cable TV and Phone plans in order to get unmetered internet access…

    “One topic addressed at the Bernstein conference was “TV Everywhere,” the initiative spearheaded by Time Warner Cable to make sure that online viewing of cable programs is only available to consumers who subscribe to video service provided by a cable, satellite or telephone company.”

Search This Site:

Contributions:

Recent Comments:

  • Mr lucky: Well I got a shock today when I called Bell to see if I had DSL in my area yet with no again, but also got told to my surprise that my Bell Portable...
  • siouxmoux: I been 10-digit dialing for years. I find it annoying when I have to switch back to last century seven digit making local calls on Old Fashion landli...
  • tricia: I have a verizon iphone, i cancelled my service and ported out my number to another company, but bc i did that they wont unleash my phone til end of ...
  • Pymm West: Sounds just like ATT. They do anything they want or don't want to do. If you don't like it where you going to go. Why in the world did the feds allow ...
  • Pymm West: Nice article, I learned some things about Wildblue I didn't know. For instance QMT allowances. Never heard anything about that from Wildblue techs, no...
  • Satori vonFaust: Here's my story - Been an AT&T internet customer (due to limited choices in my area) for several years first with wireless DSL (the laptop 'fob') ...
  • D Elefante: Interestingly the callerID for my local calls come up w/ 7 digits. It irritates my wife who uses the phone's memory to callback, and low and behold V...
  • Lorna: It just keeps getting more ridiculous. Now Rogers customer relations and support see my name in caller ID and just hang up. Ok - I am totally on b...
  • Bob: I spoke to Bell today. Was told they no longer sell wireless service to my location (rural Caledon) and they offer NO alternative, not even dialup sin...
  • David Young: David says: Just received the two clearcast antennas I purchased today. When placing my order, the sales rep. said a two year warranty was only $...
  • da1beast: how do i sing up?...
  • Alex Perrier: Canadians have this too in the National Capital, and we got used to it. i barely remember the days of dialing seven numbers instead of ten!...

Your Account: