Home » Time Warner Cable » Currently Reading:

Telecom Analyst: Cap ‘n Tier “Is Going to Happen”

Phillip Dampier June 2, 2009 Time Warner Cable 2 Comments

Craig Moffett, cable and telecom analyst at Sanford C. Bernstein & Company, is back rallying for consumption based billing, dismissing accusations it represents a stealth rate increase.  Moffett characterized Time Warner Cable’s negative experience as only a temporary setback.

Moffett told The Wall Street Journal:

“Look, there’s a real argument for some form of consumption-based billing, and it’s going to happen,” he said. “Time Warner got the pricing wrong, it got the P.R. wrong, but this is not some kind of stealth price increase. They’ve been clear – they don’t want to discourage the use of the [broadband] product, but they have be able to manage the increased use of bandwidth that goes with Web-based video.”

In the same article, however, Moffett had nothing but praise for attempts to control web video so that only authenticated cable TV subscribers get access, for a price.  Bandwidth caps and limits help discourage online video consumption among subscribers concerned about exceeding monthly limits, particularly those set at paltry levels that virtually assure video watchers exceed them.

One topic addressed at the Bernstein conference was “TV Everywhere,” the initiative spearheaded by Time Warner Cable to make sure that online viewing of cable programs is only available to consumers who subscribe to video service provided by a cable, satellite or telephone company.

Cable operators say that if they’re going to pay millions of dollars in fees to film and TV studios in exchange for the right to air their programs, those studios shouldn’t turn around and offer the same shows over the Web for free.

Moffett says that while there “are a lot of specifics” to be worked out, including how to authenticate paid video subscribers on the Web without hassle, “TV Everywhere” is a “very positive step for operators and programmers, because it’s at least some attempt at a strategic alignment, rather than for each side to go it alone, which is what they’ve done traditionally.”

The broader scope of the Journal article was to measure Wall Street’s reaction to cable stocks in general.  Investors are looking for assurances of significant returns, something more difficult to achieve in a problematic economy.  Stop the Cap! contends that changing the business model of cable broadband with Cap ‘n Tier billing like Time Warner Cable tested, is precisely aimed at increasing those returns, particularly in markets where limited or insufficient competition holds customers virtually hostage to the cable provider.




Share

Other stories of interest:

  1. Time Warner Cable Ends Cap ‘n Tier “Trial” in Beaumont
  2. News 14 Carolina: We’ll Help Customers Decide What Tier They Belong In
  3. Time Warner Cable CEO Still Loves Cap ‘n Tier Approach to Internet Billing
  4. Radio Havana: Soaking In The Propaganda On TW’s Twitter Channels & An Update On That 50/5 $99 Tier
  5. TV Everywhere Not Even Free to Cable Subscribers?

Currently there are 2 comments on this Article:

  1. jr says:

    “only millionaires deserve to go online”-Craig Moffett

  2. SS says:

    At least they’re being honest about their intentions to be anti-competitive and stop consumer choice in the marketplace by bundling and forcing broadband users to buy into expensive cable TV and Phone plans in order to get unmetered internet access…

    “One topic addressed at the Bernstein conference was “TV Everywhere,” the initiative spearheaded by Time Warner Cable to make sure that online viewing of cable programs is only available to consumers who subscribe to video service provided by a cable, satellite or telephone company.”

Search This Site:

Contributions:

Recent Comments:

  • Sean: A phone company says having customers with working phones is a harmful business model? WTH?...
  • txpatriot: Have any of those mayors asked whether Marriott has built luxury hotels in those depressed areas, or why Cadillac hasn't opened car dealerships in tho...
  • txpatriot: I love it -- this article has NOTHING to do with caps, broadband or anything else related to "Promoting Better Broadband, Fighting Data Caps, Usage-Ba...
  • Bill: It doesn't exactly sound like Verizon is the victim in this article: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/bruce-kushnick/the-great-verizon-fios-ripoff_b_1...
  • txpatriot: Scott here's another example, this time by a start-up which by definition is somewhat smaller than google: http://www.nytimes.com/2012/05/23/techno...
  • txpatriot: Phillip, I get that you don't like the VZ co-marketing deal, but can we stick to the subject? The 400 word article you wrote was about CABLE companie...
  • txpatriot: Scott, it takes only one counterexample to disprove a general claim. And surely you're not suggesting that only a company as big as google could ...
  • Scott: I'm afraid I don't share your optimism when you're have to point out a company with a market cap of nearly 200 billion dollars paying a 3rd party to b...
  • Phillip Dampier: In the context of the co-marketing agreement between the cable industry and the nation's biggest wireless operator (Verizon Wireless), building out Wi...
  • txpatriot: Scott, I didn't respond to your comments on barriers to entry. I agree that incumbents have significant advantages as "first-movers". But incumb...
  • txpatriot: "The consumer advocacy group Public Knowledge on Monday criticized an announcement by a group of major cable companies that their customers would now ...
  • George: Schenectady has some of the poorest population in the entire upstate region and they have FiOS. This is a load of bunk. The reason for the lack of exp...

Your Account: