Home » Time Warner Cable » Currently Reading:

Example #218 of Time Warner Cable “Listening” to Customers: ‘Deleted Unread’

Phillip Dampier June 1, 2009 Time Warner Cable 10 Comments

Back in April, Time Warner advertised a “central” e-mail address it wanted customers to use to “share ideas and views” about their gouging Cap ‘n Tier pricing scheme.  The company promised it was on a listening tour, enthusiastically promising to read, consider, and respond to customer concerns.

Over on Broadband Reports, “De” finally received a reply to input sent more than a month ago:

Well I eventually submitted an email to TWC about the caps on April 14th. To prove they pay attention to their customers, they sent me this reply today (Over a month later) LMAO:

To: RealIdeas
Subject: Greedy Bandwidth Caps. The truth!?
Sent: Tue, 14 Apr 2009 04:22:52 -0400<  >

was deleted without being read on Sun, 31 May 2009 01:49:12 -0400

Just goes to prove they don’t care if the consumer wants the per byte billing or not – it’s coming anyway.

Our opinions and views are nothing to TWC — all that matters is the $$$$. The whole PR about them listening is just to ease media and political pressure. They have made their mind up already.

Share

Other stories of interest:

  1. Our “Take Action” Plans
  2. Example #165 of Time Warner Cable “Listening” to Customers
  3. WGHP Triad – Time Warner Protests In Greensboro & Rochester
  4. Breaking News: The Shock & Stupidity of Time Warner: Profiteering Gone Wild
  5. Time Warner Tosses Customers Powerboost Bone? Now Hit Your Usage Cap Faster Than Ever!

Currently there are 10 comments on this Article:

  1. Judy Gunter says:

    And I’ve made up my mind already. I’m moving soon and I will no longer subscribe to Cable TV. That’s $80 a month loss revenue for them.

    Take that, TWC!

  2. jr says:

    TWC see themselves as the Seven Sages of Greece and we’re a bunch of bumpkins

  3. Tim says:

    No offense, but the language in the subject line is a little, well, strong. If I were them I wouldn’t read it either. Greedy? Even though I agree with you on that, they are going to say, “Whatever dude, delete.” Don’t get me wrong, I do agree with your subject. I think the SOB’s are greedy little pinheads that would upend their customers so they could shake every dime out of their pocket if they could get away with it.

    • preventCAPS says:

      I too received the same responses to my messages sent to realideas, and I belive that their subject and contents were objective:

      Your message

      To: RealIdeas
      Subject: In response to Landel Hobbs 4/9 Statement
      Sent: Thu, 9 Apr 2009 23:39:36 -0400

      was not readTue, 26 May 2009 01:38:19 -0400਍

      Final-Recipient: RFC822; RealIdeas@twcable.com
      Disposition: automatic-action/MDN-sent-automatically; deleted

  4. I’ll add that your evidence points to whoever was assigned this e-mail address just simply didn’t decide to check it. So that’s pretty crappy.

    The only possible explanation that’s not due to laziness, mismanagement, or a stupid mistake (like not routing realideas@twcable.com to anyone’s actual address) is that the box got so swamped with mail due to an overwhelming response that it was just impossible to read everything.

    Either way, it’s not a good indicator.

    • preventCAPS says:

      I did receive the following respons (around 4/30) multiple times to earlier emails sent to realideas on (4/9). The thing that got m was they referenced the statement from 4/9, even though they abandonded the trials on 4/16.

      Hello,

      Thanks for taking the time to provide us with your feedback. We really
      appreciate hearing from you.

      Although this is an automated response, please know that your e-mail is
      being read and your thoughts are being discussed as we continue to
      research the tiered pricing program.

      As you may have already heard, TWC’s Chief Operating Officer, Landel
      Hobbs, issued a statement on April 9 to provide an update, and further
      clarification on our Consumption Based Billing Trials. Please click the
      following link to view the statement. http://a.longreply.com/109511
      .

      Rest assured, as this program continues to be rolled out, you will
      receive more updates from us.

      Thanks again for your patience, and thanks for being a customer.

      Time Warner Cable

      • Ah hah! Well, that explains what happened. They gave it a mailbox on the Exchange Server but no one checked it. An autoresponder was set up.

        The number of e-mails hit whatever limit they set for it (probably something low like 5MB–just a guess). After that it just started deleting FIFO.

        Someone dropped the ball: Either the person who was supposed to check these, or the person who was supposed to assign this responsibility to someone.

  5. [...] to keep going as planed, regardless of customer feedback. They claim they’re listening, but other articles show [...]

Search This Site:

Contributions:

Recent Comments:

  • Ron: What a bunch of dumb ass idiots you all are. If you fools fall for a marketing ploy like this piece of crap then you deserve to get screwed. Doesn't a...
  • Earl: I thought AT$T had already lobbied for legislation against this in Ohio....
  • Andrew Madigan: It was conditional to allow the company to try to prove that they had a way around the interference. They didn't have any way to avoid interference, ...
  • Phillip Dampier: I believe Verizon kicked in some additional routers for free, if I recall correctly, but that probably turned into a grand write-off of equipment they...
  • Jerry: Comcast may be the favorite in Fort Wayne but I remember when they were tossed out of Southern California for poor service. I am no way a fran of...
  • Keania: @Audie, Customer service is available from Mon-Wed: 8:30am – 9:00pm, Thurs: 9:00am – 9:00pm and Fri: 8:30am – 9:00pm If you every need clarification o...
  • dorothy grun ewald: i have filled out the forms with the asistance of the att.gen office and yet to recieve refund and am still being charged for roadside assistance, af...
  • George Douglas: The vendor was Verizon Network Integration, not Cisco. Cisco sales agents recommended a $487 router when asked by the newspaper what was needed for th...
  • Audie: The clear cast paper advertisement was meant to deceive people. By the way it was written, it was clearly a cloudy way of presentation. It is also pri...
  • Brad: I just received an ad in the mail for this "revolution" promising I could get it for $47 if I was one of the first people to call in. I don't have a ...
  • Phillip Dampier: My personal guess is they will not be touched for the foreseeable future. E-mail addresses are an incredibly customer sensitive issue and many people ...
  • Phillip Dampier: KCMO and KCK will almost certainly remain very aggressively priced because of Google competition, and the granularity of that pricing should be city-w...

Your Account: