Traditionally, data plans from wireless phone providers, whether they call them “unlimited” or not, usually carry a fine print “5GB monthly usage limit” somewhere in the terms and conditions.  Some providers do nothing if you happen to exceed it, others will threaten to terminate your service, or charge you overlimit fees that quietly accumulate until the phone bill arrives in the mail.  Wireless data providers limit consumption primarily because they don’t have the capacity to provide you with limitless access, at least not yet.  But the paltry limits most providers set, with nasty overlimit fees for exceeding them, aren’t justified either.  Most providers do everything but come out and admit you are only supposed to use their services for web browsing and e-mail reading, so control yourself.

Verizon Wireless has a complication, however.  In the coming week, they are expected to unveil an HP 115NR Netbook with built-in wireless broadband capability designed to work on Verizon’s network.  The Netbook will cost $199 after mail-in rebate, and your commitment to a two year service contract with a data plan priced $40-60 a month.

… Continue Reading

One of the biggest anti-consumer disasters of the last 15 years was President Clinton’s signing of the 1996 Communications Act.  This bought and paid for legislation deregulated a major part of the telecommunications sector with the idea that the “free market” would somehow provide sufficient checks and balances to protect against media concentration, monopoly abuse, and locking out technological advancement wherever robust competition was unlikely.

How’s that working out for you?

Consolidation and corporate control of broadcasting, telephony, broadband, and other communications services has been rampant and largely unchecked by the Federal Communications Commission during the last 10+ years.  The result is a handful of players controlling the services we all depend on in our daily lives.  Usage caps and overpriced tiered billing is just the latest example of market concentration.  Companies realize consumers have few options for equivalent services, so they can dictate the terms and conditions with almost no oversight or control.  Local and state governments confronting this issue have come to realize their hands are tied, because telecommunications deregulation without assurances of a competitive marketplace always equal monopolistic behavior.

Net neutrality has also been a victim of a hands-off regulatory authority that is supposed to foster competition, equity in access, and prohibit abusive behavior.  The Federal Communications Commission has failed on every front.

… Continue Reading

Thanks to Jay Ovittore and the City of Wilson, we have the video from the consideration of HB 1252, the horrible bill that would have made municipal broadband a virtual impossibility in the state of North Carolina.  Everyone who participated in our pushback should give themselves a pat on the back, because YOU helped make all the difference between broadband choice and advancement in the state vs. forcing communities into a broadband backwater.  Don’t believe for a second you just have to sit back and take what big telecom forces on you.  This shows you don’t!

This is what we can do — make the difference!

The NC Public Utilities Committee sends HB 1252 to a study committee. May 6, 2009.

Frontier Essentially Accuses Time Warner Cable of Being a Shakedown Artist

Frontier Communications has continued its aggressive campaign to hit back against its cable competition, most notably Time Warner Cable.  In its most recent advertising in the Rochester area, Frontier compared Time Warner Cable’s broadband usage caps and rate hikes “the Cable shakedown.”  Wow.  Even we don’t go that far.

Frontier has gotten aggressive since Time Warner Cable made Rochester, Frontier’s largest service area, a test market for its Cap ‘n Tier program, temporarily shelved.  Frontier doesn’t believe for a second that Time Warner Cable is done with metered billing in this community, and neither do we.  So they are going to spend the summer continuing efforts to poach Time Warner’s customers.

Meanwhile, Frontier CEO and Chairwoman Maggie Wilderotter has penned an e-mail being sent to every Frontier customer commenting on the economy and calling out cable for annual rate increases:

Dear Frontier Customer,

We are in tough economic times. As you look for ways to save money, I want to assure you Frontier is dedicated to providing you with robust, value-added voice, high-speed data and video products.

Now, more than ever, Frontier is committed to the communities we serve. As a significant employer and a major taxpayer, Frontier takes pride in our active role in our markets. Our local managers and front line employees are highly visible and involved in many community organizations and events. They stand ready to suggest ways to use our services and resources wisely.

We provide innovative solutions and products for all types of communications needs. Fast, reliable communications technology, especially broadband, has never been more important. Customers tell me that as their budgets get smaller, the value of using our services in the home increases. Many families rely on Frontier products for their jobs, education and entertainment. Whether it’s Digital Voice, Data, or Video, we are here to help you explore different product and pricing options. Just visit any Frontier location or give us a call at 800-921-8101 and our customer care representatives will help you.

Despite recessionary times, Frontier continues to invest in the technology that gives you the power to connect at home, in the office or on the go with speed and reliability. We are committed to your complete satisfaction. Unlike our Cable Operator competitors, we don’t depend upon an annual rate increase; in fact, Frontier provides price protection plans so you know what to expect during your agreement term. We are proud to offer the best products at the best prices in our markets – with unparalleled service to make the customer experience the best it can be. Frontier is local, financially solid, and optimistic about the future.

Although none of us know when it will happen, I do believe better times are ahead. We have been tested before and emerged stronger. We will get through this, and Frontier is here for you in good times and challenging times.

Thank you again for your business and support. We take it seriously and all of us at Frontier will continue to work hard to provide you with the best communications products and services.

Sincerely,
Maggie Wilderotter
Chairman and CEO
Frontier Communications
frontier@frontiercorp.com
I can help you!

Now if only their DSL product could deliver consistent results no matter where their customers might live (and they keep their own 5GB ‘acceptable use’ stuff unmonitored and unenforced.)

While the vast majority of comments have welcomed the new theme we’ve adopted here, I have heard from a handful who are having problems with the theme or layout.  Upon further investigation, I have uncovered most fall into one of these categories:

• Internet Explorer 6.  You -must- upgrade your browser.  Internet Explorer 6 is no longer supported and represents a serious security risk in today’s online world of browser exploits and malware.  I wouldn’t feel safe using IE6 to do any secure tasks these days.  Functionally, there are several features here which will not work with this browser properly.  If you are using this browser, you will see a security warning at the top of your screen prompting you to update effective today.  You don’t need to rely on Microsoft’s Internet Explorer.  In truth, the majority of our visitors here access this site using Firefox, Mac users prefer Safari (and there is a Windows version available as well).  I use Firefox myself.  It’s free and will import all of your bookmarks, so it’s painless.  You’ll also enjoy a lot of the new features and faster browsing.  The truth is, a lot of web pages are going to look strange using IE6, not just ours, and that will increasingly be the case as more and more sites drop support for this ancient browser version.  At the very least, if you like Internet Explorer, upgrade to at least version 7.  You’ll find it on the IE update page referenced above in the lower right corner.
• Screen Size.  If you are running at less than 1024×768 screen resolution, things are probably looking mighty squished.  I understand this, and the “busy-ness” it creates.  I have been waiting for the theme author to release his next update which will fix some of this.  In the meantime, I think the best choice for us will be to try switching to a two-column format.  You’ll see the articles appearing in 66% of the space, with the right side column containing the featured articles, recent comments, and some other stuff.  I have temporarily disabled some of the items that were in the center column to give people more white space.  Tonight, we’ll try expanding the layout.  However, as the vast majority of our visitors here arrive using a minimum of 1024×768 resolution, that will be the minimum resolution that I will be developing this site to work best with.
• Mobile Browsers & Netbooks: I am testing some plug-ins and add-ons to greatly improve options for those using these devices.  Hang in there.

I also strongly urge people who want to participate in our comments to register for an account here so they aren’t bothered with having to enter their name and e-mail address each time they want to leave a comment.  It literally takes seconds, because we don’t have a bloated sign-up procedure.  Your temporary password will be e-mailed to you (and after that you can change it), so make sure you use a valid e-mail address.

Residents of Austin need to make plans to attend a meeting this Wednesday the 13th at 6:30pm at City Hall to be sure your voices are heard regarding the possibility of Time Warner Cable returning with its metered billing and rationing plan this fall.  It would also be a great time to call attention to the company suspending customer accounts for “excessive consumption” as we’ve documented.

Michael Chaney, one of our readers, gave us the heads-up and also pointed us to the Austinist news and culture site, which published news about the meeting:

Chairman Chip Rosenthal said public input last month justified further inquiry into the metered bandwidth issue, and that the commission is now looking for policy input from experts in regulatory matters. That process, which may take months, begins with Wednesday’s meeting of the Austin Community Technology and Telecommunications Commission.

Rosenthal said the commission faces two challenges:

“As far as we can tell, the city has little regulatory authority over the [Time Warner Cable] broadband Internet product. Yes, TWC does hold a city-granted franchise, but that agreement only covers cable video services,” Rosenthal said. “(Also) the grounds for action are more uncertain now that TWC has rescinded metering (for the time being, so they say). How do you ask for relief when you aren’t being damaged? So, the current effort may end up being groundwork, so that we’re better if they do come back.”

Stop the Cap! will be glad to work on some written input for the meeting which we’ll publish here before Wednesday, should one of our Austin readers like to provide it to them.  Rosenthal is correct — Time Warner Cable’s broadband services are unregulated.  However, forcing language that prohibits capping or tiered pricing into a franchise renewal agreement is a possibility, as would other options ranging from exploring municipal broadband or outright non-renewal of the company’s franchise.

Rosenthal is right to consider their exploration of this issue laying “groundwork,” because we are convinced Time Warner Cable has not permanently shelved these pricing schemes by any means.

What: Austin Community Technology & Telecommunications Commission meeting on TWC metered billing and other issues.

Where: City Hall – Room 1101, 301 W. 2nd Street, Austin, Texas

When: Wednesday May 13, 6:30pm

Details: Agenda & Meeting Information, List of Monthly Time Warner Cable Complaints, Emerging Tech Presentation

Website: Austin Community Technology & Telecommunications Commission

The nabobs of negativism, the panic-stricken shrieks about the Internet becoming full, the fear-mongering about broadband pipes becoming clogged because the kid down the street is running torrents again.  We’ve heard it all before, and as we’ve always said, technological advancement always seems to find a way to resolve the “crisis in bandwidth” before big businesses resolve it themselves by rationing, capping, or overcharging for access.

And so it has again.

AT&T, in association with Corning and NEC today smashed all prior records of fiber optic transmission capacity by successfully transmitting data at 114 Gigabits per second over a single strand of fiber for up to 580 kilometers over an optically amplified link.  The standard fiber optic cable AT&T used for the test contains 320 separate optical channels, meaning through the use of just a single optical cable, it is possible to sustain a transmission rate of 36480 Gigabits per second!

That exceeds by 25% the last record setting transmission rate test and effectively doubles the distance the cable can maintain data transmission rates without unacceptable loss.

AT&T announced the results as part of their technological solution for broadband growth — deploying 100 Gigabit networks across the country to accommodate growing demand for the Internet.

… Continue Reading

We are working on the comments editor bug reported over the weekend, which allows some Firefox users to find their comment text spilling beyond the right margin of the editor.  I am not seeing this happen myself, and I use Firefox, but we’ll be double checking the code.

The About Us section here has been completely redone.  It contains a list of our team members, a revised Mission Statement, and our new Privacy Policy.  It’s part of my effort to overhaul the information that I haven’t had time to work on since April.  The alternative provider section will be the nightmare.  I really need help from folks outside of Rochester to help me develop appropriate information for other cities.  It is far easier for me if you are willing to work within our own online editor to develop this instead of sending me a lot of text in e-mail.  The editor is very simple to work with.  All you need is a registered account here and I can extend editor access to you.

The cities drop-down menu was not designed to be “comprehensive” going-forward.  Over time, if/when additional cities become hotbeds of capping, that format will be reconsidered.

Jay Ovittore is our first Issues Coordinator, for North Carolina.  We seriously need additional coordinators, especially for Texas which is a hotbed of capping.  The requirements are simply your willingness to develop content for Stop the Cap! and to be enthusiastic and engaged in fighting back.  We can use multiple coordinators in Texas because of the various cities involved.  Use the contact form if you are interested.

There are a few additional side projects I am also working on, particularly for e-mail notification of new content/calls to action and mobile access issues.

Keep an eye out for more new things, and some adjustments to our look going forward.

Todd Spangler, who we seem to spar with on a semi-regular basis here, has another blog entry up expanding on his views of why Time Warner Cable’s metered pricing experiment failed.  Of course, completely missing from the list is the fact most customers do not want it.  That’s dangerous to say in a cable industry trade publication like Multichannel News, however.

Todd still thinks it’s all about how they did it, not the fact they did it in the first place that created what even he admits was a “category five” storm of backlash.

Clearly, the company’s idea — given that these were trials — was to have the flexibility to tweak pricing, adjust specific cap levels, etc., and not have these things set in stone. But the ad-hoc communications on the usage trials was perhaps the biggest reason this blew up.

The only “trial” here was on the customer, and the jury was stacked with Time Warner Cable executives who already found themselves innocent of extortionist pricing and market abuse.  The “tweak” most customers wanted was none at all.  What was set in stone, until the groundswell finally achieved temporary results, was that the caps were coming no matter what customers had to say.  Just ask people in Beaumont, Texas.

… Continue Reading

North Carolina is not the only state where big telecom providers have gotten laws passed to protect their incumbency and monopoly/duopoly pricing.  From 2004, here is a list of the other states.  This may be one of the issues we may want to work on in the future.  These laws need to be repealed.  Local communities should not have their hands tied on broadband by one or two providers that only understand the word “no.”

State Barriers to Community Broadband Services

(updated December 2004)

Arkansas prohibits municipal entities from providing basic local exchange services. (Ark. Code § 23-17-409)

Florida imposes various taxes to increase the prices of telecommunications services (as distinguished from other services) sold by public entities. (Florida Statutes §§ 125.421, 166.047, 196.012, 199.183 and 212.08). Declared unconstitutional under Florida law, City of Gainesville v. Zingale, CA No. 2000-CA-00 1582 (Cir. Ct. 2d Cir., Leon Co., March 20, 2002), aff’d, Dep’t of Revenue v. City of Gainesville, No. 1D02-1582 (Dist. Ct. App., 1st Dist., Nov. 26, 2003), appeal pending in Florida Supreme Court.

… Continue Reading