Home » Frontier » Currently Reading:

Consumers Worry About Frontier-Verizon Phone Swap

Phillip Dampier May 13, 2009 Frontier 12 Comments

Having your local phone company disappear and get replaced by another provider isn’t an everyday occurrence for most people.  Customers are concerned about the impact of Verizon leaving their area, to be replaced by Frontier, an unfamiliar company for most parts of the country.  We have the video.

Let’s begin in Fort Wayne, Indiana, where WANE-TV interviews one worried local businessman already dissatisfied with what Verizon was charging, and wonder what surprises Frontier will bring:





Share

Other stories of interest:

  1. Frontier Tells Customers “Not to Worry”; The Cap is a “Guideline”
  2. Management At Frontier Still Gung Ho For 5GB Cap… Just Not Until They Can Sell You On It
  3. Lots of Great Ideas – Keep Them Coming!
  4. Frontier Targeted for Takeover? Deal “Likely Within Six Months,” Says Industry Analyst
  5. Frontier Working My Last Nerve…

Currently there are 12 comments on this Article:

  1. jr says:

    Another downside of recessions besides all the suffering is merger mania

  2. Brion says:

    WXXI public radio in Rochester has a brief segment on these purchases and speculate that farther down the road it may mean Verizon gets to take over the Rochester market (Frontier keeps the rural segment) and maybe, just maybe we’ll have FiOS to compete with TWC.

    Speculative indeed, but at least there’s a little bit of optimism: http://www.publicbroadcasting.net/wxxi/news.newsmain?action=article&ARTICLE_ID=1505427

    • Mazakman says:

      Interesting segment. And yes, the question is … why indeed would Frontier wish to stay in Rochester because it sure does not fit in with their “rural” area service.
      Thanks for posting the link to that Brion.

  3. Uncle Ken says:

    Is rural service a real money maker Frontier must think so if they are willing to part with 8 billion. My comment will stay in this region as I do not know how the others work. When / if this happens Frontier will have the best of both worlds for the moment the rural and the denser city systems. For a moment lets assume I live south of Rochester on a big hill top with 5 other houses 10 miles from the closest gas station. If the studies prove true that in high tech areas 80 percent of the people have cell phones ok what service can Frontier provide me? A copper wire phone yes DSL no way no structures in place close enough. And what about TV I think TW has that covered. Frontier has provided copper phone service here for many years and their outside service is very timely given your nice to the service people on the phone as it is not their fault and that brings me to my final thought. Something more then we know is cooking behind closed doors and what is cooking may be a good thing.

  4. Uncle Ken says:

    I do not think that Consumers have to Worry About the Frontier-Verizon Phone Swap. Our phone company has gone through how many name changes but the poles are the same the wires are the same the only thing that changed was the address on the bill. Worry from change is a natural feeling one I think and hope is unfounded.

  5. Mazakman says:

    The Frontier installer that was here this morning said that he thought that it could be more likely that Windstream acquires the local Frontier service area. And yes, I am on DSL at the moment. Seeing max speeds of about 5.8 mb/sec down and 380 kb/sec up, but excellent ping and tracert times. I was told to wait 24 hours for the circuit to complete and then check my speed again. I do know that I am seeing lower download and upload speeds than what I saw here last year from Frontier.

    • I think yesterday’s news is a game changer. My personal thinking is that Frontier will, at some point, discard Rochester (but there is no assurance Verizon would be a buyer) to focus on its core rural business plan. They just jumped into first place, so I think it’s likely they are not going to be easy pickens for awhile, especially with credit markets still reluctant to hand out blank checks.

      If I got more than 5Mbps, I probably would have kept DSL as a backup provider here, but 3.1Mbps is ridiculous, especially for the amount of money being charged. Considering the complete lack of resistance to my cancellation request, I suspect they felt it wasn’t really acceptable either.

      As other technologies zoom ahead of DSL speedwise, this is going to be a product that will probably be irrelevant outside of rural areas where cable/fiber just isn’t going to happen.

  6. Dan S. says:

    So, I guess that means any hope for FIOS in the RTP region of North Carolina has just gone up in smoke.

  7. David says:

    I had a very similar episode with Frontier when I lived in Gates and not all that far from their Long Pond Rd CO, when they could only get me a mind-numbing 56k down…yeah I did say 56k. As you can probably guess, I had an RR installation scheduled within milliseconds of that conversation. I also had zero resistance to canceling my service, which I was semi-surprised about, but with those speeds resistance would have been beyond futile. I would like to think at some point Frontier would gracefully bow out of Rochester and turn things over to Verizon and (hopefully) FiOS in the not too distant future.

    • Joe says:

      I too live in Gates and had DSL with Frontier. I was satisfied with the service until I wanted to cancel my landline telephone. I swear its easier to rebuild a car engine than get your landline disconnected. I got severe run around for months and was finally told that I could not have DSL without a landline. CANCEL IT ALL! I told them. I said they better get out of the stoneage or else go out of business. I went with RR and then the cap talk started, ugh! Cant seem to win but im glad TW halted the cap crap so far or else I would seriuosly think about going back to Frontier and having a landline even though we dont need it, just to get DSL.

      • Mazakman says:

        Joe. I just had Frontier DSL installed yesterday. You do not need a landline anymore from them. It is called standalone service. I did find out by accident that the phone number that has been assigned to my account can receive calls, but calls cannot be made. :)

        So far , so good. The speed is adequate for what we do and the latency is low. I think that before the TW store closes tonight that my Roadrunner modem will be returned to them and Roadrunner cancelled.

  8. Uncle Ken says:

    I Agree Verizon is such a natural for this area so I have to think something else big is in the way now. There is nothing wrong with RR until they started the cap idea. Verizon as they grow could pull the same stunt as could anybody. ATT is about the only company big enough to think of coming here but I also think they do not want to get into a war with the Rochester area right in the middle of it. I do think we are in the eye of the storm as everyone tries to figure out what everyone else is going to do. For the most part things have got very quite. No doubt they all read this site everyday and found out it can make a difference and they also know this site can fight more then one war at a time and that scares them.

Search This Site:

Contributions:

Recent Comments:

  • Sean: A phone company says having customers with working phones is a harmful business model? WTH?...
  • txpatriot: Have any of those mayors asked whether Marriott has built luxury hotels in those depressed areas, or why Cadillac hasn't opened car dealerships in tho...
  • txpatriot: I love it -- this article has NOTHING to do with caps, broadband or anything else related to "Promoting Better Broadband, Fighting Data Caps, Usage-Ba...
  • Bill: It doesn't exactly sound like Verizon is the victim in this article: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/bruce-kushnick/the-great-verizon-fios-ripoff_b_1...
  • txpatriot: Scott here's another example, this time by a start-up which by definition is somewhat smaller than google: http://www.nytimes.com/2012/05/23/techno...
  • txpatriot: Phillip, I get that you don't like the VZ co-marketing deal, but can we stick to the subject? The 400 word article you wrote was about CABLE companie...
  • txpatriot: Scott, it takes only one counterexample to disprove a general claim. And surely you're not suggesting that only a company as big as google could ...
  • Scott: I'm afraid I don't share your optimism when you're have to point out a company with a market cap of nearly 200 billion dollars paying a 3rd party to b...
  • Phillip Dampier: In the context of the co-marketing agreement between the cable industry and the nation's biggest wireless operator (Verizon Wireless), building out Wi...
  • txpatriot: Scott, I didn't respond to your comments on barriers to entry. I agree that incumbents have significant advantages as "first-movers". But incumb...
  • txpatriot: "The consumer advocacy group Public Knowledge on Monday criticized an announcement by a group of major cable companies that their customers would now ...
  • George: Schenectady has some of the poorest population in the entire upstate region and they have FiOS. This is a load of bunk. The reason for the lack of exp...

Your Account: