Home » Time Warner Cable » Currently Reading:

Rochester Democrat & Chronicle Blisters Time Warner Over Internet Caps

Phillip Dampier April 10, 2009 Time Warner Cable 4 Comments

The Rochester Democrat & Chronicle published an editorial this morning decrying Time Warner’s bungled proposal to introduce what they call a “tiered pricing system.”

The Rochester region has questions, Time Warner. Lots of them.

Your plans to create a tiered pricing system for Internet usage has come out of the cyber-blue, accompanied by a dismissive attitude that consumer complaints are OK, but, hey, a little late in the game. You’ve decided, you control the local market for high-speed Internet service and we’re just going to have to adjust.

Time Warner executives agreed to meet this week with the Editorial Board but canceled after learning of plans here to cover the event with live video to be streamed onto DemocratandChronicle.com. This was no gotcha condition. The company’s announcement to establish a usage pricing system has provoked a near firestorm of complaint and opposition. Putting the company on camera makes sense.

Time Warner said no, that video coverage was over the top. That’s a missed opportunity. But the questions remain.

Of course, the irony is that video coverage would have been over the top for another reason: it risked helping to blow through the ludicrous usage caps Time Warner wants to impose on its customers.

Several questions also raised in the editorial deserve answers, and those answers must come from the raw data, not from internal company “analysis” that requires people to simply take their word for it.

Share

Other stories of interest:

  1. The D&C Reprints Time Warner Press Release on Road Runner Caps And Calls It a Day
  2. Media Roundup: How the Time Warner Internet Rationing Plan Is Being Covered
  3. “Internet Evangelist” Opposes Volume Caps, Limits; “They’re Not Very Useful”
  4. Rochester Television Stations Break News About Road Runner Usage Caps
  5. Group Project: Let’s Rebut The Latest from Time Warner

Currently there are 4 comments on this Article:

  1. Ben says:

    They were probably concerned that so many people would go online to the D&C website to watch that customers would hog up too much bandwidth!

  2. Mazakman says:

    Bravo D & C ! I don’t buy their paper anymore ( decided that for $.75 a day it was no longer worth it ) , but I am pleased with the stand that they are taking on this cap deal.

    • John says:

      This article is trash. As one of the first poster pointed out:

      “Weak Headline…. What’s with ‘eases’…. How about: ‘Time Warner fails to listen to its customers and smacks them in the face again…’ “.

      They need to stop burying their criticism on the second page and be honest. TW isn’t doing us any great favor by offering the same service we receive today for $150.

Search This Site:

Contributions:

Recent Comments:

  • Earl: I thought AT$T had already lobbied for legislation against this in Ohio....
  • Andrew Madigan: It was conditional to allow the company to try to prove that they had a way around the interference. They didn't have any way to avoid interference, ...
  • Phillip Dampier: I believe Verizon kicked in some additional routers for free, if I recall correctly, but that probably turned into a grand write-off of equipment they...
  • Jerry: Comcast may be the favorite in Fort Wayne but I remember when they were tossed out of Southern California for poor service. I am no way a fran of...
  • Keania: @Audie, Customer service is available from Mon-Wed: 8:30am – 9:00pm, Thurs: 9:00am – 9:00pm and Fri: 8:30am – 9:00pm If you every need clarification o...
  • dorothy grun ewald: i have filled out the forms with the asistance of the att.gen office and yet to recieve refund and am still being charged for roadside assistance, af...
  • George Douglas: The vendor was Verizon Network Integration, not Cisco. Cisco sales agents recommended a $487 router when asked by the newspaper what was needed for th...
  • Audie: The clear cast paper advertisement was meant to deceive people. By the way it was written, it was clearly a cloudy way of presentation. It is also pri...
  • Brad: I just received an ad in the mail for this "revolution" promising I could get it for $47 if I was one of the first people to call in. I don't have a ...
  • Phillip Dampier: My personal guess is they will not be touched for the foreseeable future. E-mail addresses are an incredibly customer sensitive issue and many people ...
  • Phillip Dampier: KCMO and KCK will almost certainly remain very aggressively priced because of Google competition, and the granularity of that pricing should be city-w...
  • Dave Hancock: So what will happen with the ".rr" e-mail address?...

Your Account: