Home » Frontier »Public Policy & Gov't »Time Warner Cable » Currently Reading:

Truce Declared: Frontier Suspends 5GB Usage Cap Indefinitely

Phillip Dampier October 20, 2008 Frontier, Public Policy & Gov't, Time Warner Cable No Comments

We are delighted to learn of the announcement from Frontier Communications that they have suspended their proposed 5GB usage cap indefinitely.

The company has made it clear to customers no such cap is currently in place or is being enforced, and sources told StoptheCap! the company doesn’t even have the resources available at the moment to accurately measure, much less bill consumers for their usage.

We strongly believe Frontier is in a far stronger competitive position in the marketplace without usage caps, and for their significant customer base in rural areas, where they are often the only viable broadband choice, this preserves the need Americans have to access broadband services in an equitable and fair way.

We applaud Frontier for its willingness to respond to customer concerns.




Share

Other stories of interest:

  1. Frontier Tells Customers “Not to Worry”; The Cap is a “Guideline”
  2. Frontier Usage Cap: “A Response to Illegal Resellers”
  3. FCC Commissioners “Discuss Frontier Usage Caps” At Hearing in Washington
  4. Frontier: Now With Prices Up To $10.80 Per Gigabyte, Limit Five GB
  5. The Daily Star (Oneonta, NY): Frontier To Limit Internet Usage

Search This Site:

Contributions:

Recent Comments:

  • George: Schenectady has some of the poorest population in the entire upstate region and they have FiOS. This is a load of bunk. The reason for the lack of exp...
  • Scott: I was a system administrator for a ISP and know how lucrative they are from running one before all the deregulation that made for a hostile working re...
  • txpatriot: OMG -- isn't this just a repeat of the "havoc" created when families shared a pool of voice minutes? Remember how badly THAT turned out?...
  • txpatriot: Scott, whether such charges amount to "overcharging" is subject to debate, but to say the Chairman "endorsed overcharging" is misleading at best, and ...
  • Scott: I have little sympathy for them when politicians on one hand take the corporations money for their re-election campaigns and in turn push for deregula...
  • Andrew Madigan: I doubt Verizon will expand FiOS just even if the marketing agreement is blocked. However those cities (and any other local government) should have an...
  • Scott: What else would you call charging extra fee's on top of a monthly subscription for usage that's already built-in to the cost of service? Landline b...
  • Andrew: There should be a law against this. This just reeks of corruption! How do they get away with this!? "The chairman’s comments came during an int...
  • txpatriot: Internet "overcharging" schemes? No, that's not a loaded headline at all . . ....
  • Rob: Wow, it could be worse. I'm a Time Warner subscriber. They are a decent ISP. I'm so glad I don't live in the Comcast monopoly....
  • Rob: Of course they have a good reason for usage caps. A usage cap is nothing more than a huge price increase for broadband service. So Crapcast gets to ...
  • Bev: This $20 is not a collections fee. It is nothing more than a rip off to consumers who are behind. They might label it as a collection fee, but if a ca...

Your Account: