Home » Broadband "Shortage" » Currently Reading:

Comcast Announces 250GB Monthly Cap On Broadband Users Effective October 1st

Phillip Dampier September 2, 2008 Broadband "Shortage" 2 Comments

Comcast, the nation’s largest cable broadband provider, has announced it will begin limiting customers to 250GB of usage per month on their cable modem service.   Company officials claim less than 1% of their customers consume “excessive bandwidth,” and a 250GB cap explicitly defines what constitutes excessive use.

Comcast Implements 250GB Usage Cap Effective October 1, 2008.

Comcast Implements 250GB Usage Cap Effective October 1, 2008.

250 GB/month is an extremely large amount of data, much more than a typical residential customer uses on a monthly basis. Currently, the median monthly data usage by our residential customers is approximately 2 – 3 GB. To put 250 GB of monthly usage in perspective, a customer would have to do any one of the following:

* Send 50 million emails (at 0.05 KB/email)
* Download 62,500 songs (at 4 MB/song)
* Download 125 standard-definition movies (at 2 GB/movie)
* Upload 25,000 hi-resolution digital photos (at 10 MB/photo)

Users who exceed the cap will first receive a warning, followed by account suspension for six months to a year  if they rate among the heaviest users of their Internet service.   At this time, no  extra bandwidth will be sold by Comcast.   The company has traditionally asked  very heavy users to upgrade to a business account, available at a substantially  higher cost.

The company has suggested the implementation of usage caps will provide better and more consistent speeds to their customers, blaming a small minority of customers for consuming a huge amount of bandwidth.




Share

Other stories of interest:

  1. Blocking or Metering: “A False Choice,” Concludes Advocacy Group
  2. “Internet Evangelist” Opposes Volume Caps, Limits; “They’re Not Very Useful”
  3. NBC Olympics: On the Go… Somewhere Else
  4. NBC Plans to Stream NFL Football This Fall: A False Start Called for Capped Customers
  5. Frontier: Now With Prices Up To $10.80 Per Gigabyte, Limit Five GB

Currently there are 2 comments on this Article:

  1. 75aces says:

    This is bogus. Comcast is punishing average joe because they can’t ask for more money from the hands that fed them in the first place. I don’t know anyone who just uses their service to check email and cruise the internet anymore. Most download now a days. They are going to raise prices again, and say that consumers are using up all of the bandwith and must upgrade to newer equipment. They should first acctually fix it instead of getting rich off average joe. To put a cap is dumb in the first place. The average person will see that gone by the middle of the month. We pay too much to begin with and don’t even get the acctual speed we pay for. I read on their website that the Blast service is only given spurts in the first 5-10 mb.

  2. crese25 says:

    I don’t understand why the FCC won’t regulate this company already. I filed a complaint and nothing is being done, its like the FCC doesn’t care.

Search This Site:

Contributions:

Recent Comments:

  • George: Schenectady has some of the poorest population in the entire upstate region and they have FiOS. This is a load of bunk. The reason for the lack of exp...
  • Scott: I was a system administrator for a ISP and know how lucrative they are from running one before all the deregulation that made for a hostile working re...
  • txpatriot: OMG -- isn't this just a repeat of the "havoc" created when families shared a pool of voice minutes? Remember how badly THAT turned out?...
  • txpatriot: Scott, whether such charges amount to "overcharging" is subject to debate, but to say the Chairman "endorsed overcharging" is misleading at best, and ...
  • Scott: I have little sympathy for them when politicians on one hand take the corporations money for their re-election campaigns and in turn push for deregula...
  • Andrew Madigan: I doubt Verizon will expand FiOS just even if the marketing agreement is blocked. However those cities (and any other local government) should have an...
  • Scott: What else would you call charging extra fee's on top of a monthly subscription for usage that's already built-in to the cost of service? Landline b...
  • Andrew: There should be a law against this. This just reeks of corruption! How do they get away with this!? "The chairman’s comments came during an int...
  • txpatriot: Internet "overcharging" schemes? No, that's not a loaded headline at all . . ....
  • Rob: Wow, it could be worse. I'm a Time Warner subscriber. They are a decent ISP. I'm so glad I don't live in the Comcast monopoly....
  • Rob: Of course they have a good reason for usage caps. A usage cap is nothing more than a huge price increase for broadband service. So Crapcast gets to ...
  • Bev: This $20 is not a collections fee. It is nothing more than a rip off to consumers who are behind. They might label it as a collection fee, but if a ca...

Your Account: