Home » Frontier »Windstream » Currently Reading:

Frontier Targeted for Takeover? Deal “Likely Within Six Months,” Says Industry Analyst

Phillip Dampier August 21, 2008 Frontier, Windstream 4 Comments

Reuters reported this week that a wave of consolidation in the rural telephone marketplace is about to begin as telephone companies fight  continued declines in the telephone access line business.

The biggest target for a takeover?   “Frontier Communications,” says Stanford Group analyst Michael Nelson. “They’re really the only one that would move the needle significantly,” he said.

Frontier targeted for takeover?

Frontier targeted for takeover?

Frontier, based in Stamford, Connecticut, is the nation’s fourth largest independent largely-rural telephone company, with 2.3 million telephone lines.

In the market for merger opportunities, and speculated to be looking  closely at Frontier, is Little Rock, Arkansas-based Windstream Communications.   Windstream, the nation’s second largest rural telephone company, announced it was aggressively interested in pursuing merger opportunities.

Little Rock-based Windstream Communications seen as likely suitor for Frontier Communications

Little Rock-based Windstream Communications seen as likely suitor for Frontier Communications

Windstream’s takeover of Frontier is seen  by some industry observers as practically a done deal.  

Nelson sees a Frontier deal in about six months, costing Windstream $9 billion, including the assumption of about $4.6 billion in debt.

Big deals that maximize cost savings would make sense for Windstream, according to Jefferies analyst Jonathan Levine, who said closing even small deals require a lot of money and time as they involve reviews from the regulators of each state where the target companies have operations.

“I think they’re going to probably look at some of the larger players,”  Levine told the Reuters wire service.

Windstream's Broadband Promotional Pricing for 12 Months

Such a merger would likely leave Windstream in charge of the merged company.   Windstream has aggressively deployed broadband DSL services into their rural service areas, with speeds dependent on the infrastructure available in different areas.

Windstream has no plans to implement usage caps on broadband customers at this time, nor does it charge customers for company-supplied modems.   It is too early to speculate about the impact a merger would have on existing Frontier employees.   Windstream already provides customer and technical support from call centers in India and Georgia and has a track record of eliminating or reducing staff at  call centers formerly run by its acquisition targets.

Windstream's coverage area, providing local phone service in 16 states

Windstream was created primarily from the old Alltel network of local telephone companies, mixing in customers from VALOR/GTE Southwest, GTE Georgia, Standard Group, Aliant, and CT Communications.   From a series of acquisitions, it rebranded itself as Windstream Corporation in 2006, dropping the Alltel name.

Consolidation is expected to become a growing factor in the independent telephone company marketplace, as companies face significant challenges from cable systems and wireless phone companies.

The nation’s number three independent telephone company, CenturyTel of Monroe, Louisiana, may also be interested in  Frontier, and could spark a bidding war  for Frontier’s assets.    CenturyTel is also reportedly looking at  Iowa Telecom or Consolidated Communications as potential merger targets.

Only one independent telephone company, the nation’s largest, Embarq, spun off by Sprint-Nextel, is not likely to be in a position to begin a shopping spree.   Analysts report the company’s poorly positioned to embark on a merger adventure because of the company’s perceived lower value.   Analysts have urged Embarq to begin cost-cutting and improve earnings.

Frontier Communications stock has been progressively increasing in value since merger speculation began.   The company is currently trading at 12.72 per share.




Share

Other stories of interest:

  1. Frontier Reveals Plans of Usage Cap Implementation to Employees; Leaves Customers In The Dark Until It’s A Done Deal
  2. Taking the “Citizens” Out of Citizens Communications
  3. Frontier CEO Tells Customers To Stay Home This Summer (But Stay Offline)
  4. Frontier Tells Customers “Not to Worry”; The Cap is a “Guideline”
  5. Frontier Losses Accelerate In Traditional Phone Line Business; Asks Data Customers To Make Up The Difference

Currently there are 4 comments on this Article:

  1. phil says:

    Some personal comments and observations:

    1) If this comes to pass, Windstream management in Little Rock will almost certainly be guiding the future of Windstream. Historically in their other mergers, this has always been the case. Others get exit packages or absorption into the Windstream way of thinking.

    2) The company has a reasonably good track record, and is aggressively trying to wire even their most rural territories with 6mbps DSL, which is an improvement over what is usually available in the most rural areas of the country.

    3) Their pricing is reasonable but not exceptional. The pricing in the article reflects the first year of service for new customers. Rates increase after that. At least they don’t charge a modem rental fee – one is provided for free after rebate (and you eat the sales tax and $12.95 shipping fee) to customers.

    4) Support might be an issue – they have outsourced some of it to India (ugh) which means accent barriers. I am worried about the impact on jobs here in Rochester. If Windstream maintains their track record, I would be concerned about still having one in a call center locally. In their other mergers, most of these people end up getting let go.

    5) The oddity would be the Rochester, NY (585 area code) service area. The old Rochester Telephone system which is the largest operating company in Frontier territory is much, much larger than the traditional rural telcos these independents serve. Would Windstream see more value in retaining a Rochester 585 area telco, or put it up for sale to recoup some expenses (potentially opening the door to Verizon?)

    6) Company officials confirm they have no plans for a usage cap at this time, which is a big bonus for customers!

  2. Sheryl T says:

    Always a good idea to have a good provider.

  3. Associated Press: Internet provider’s usage cap raises questions « Michigan Telephone, VoIP and Broadband blog says:

    [...] of hope for Frontier Communications customers is that there’s a rumor going around today that the company might be sold to Little Rock, Arkansas-based Windstream Communications in the next six months or so. As the linked article states, Windstream has no plans to implement [...]

  4. Doug says:

    Phil, We (WIndstream employees) were told that as of Sept 8 the relationship with the call center in India will be terminated. Very good news.

    Also as to the size of Rochester, we already have Lexington, KY which is about double the size of Rochester so I don’t think the size of the city would, in itself, be reason to sell it off.

Search This Site:

Contributions:

Recent Comments:

  • Mr lucky: Well I got a shock today when I called Bell to see if I had DSL in my area yet with no again, but also got told to my surprise that my Bell Portable...
  • siouxmoux: I been 10-digit dialing for years. I find it annoying when I have to switch back to last century seven digit making local calls on Old Fashion landli...
  • tricia: I have a verizon iphone, i cancelled my service and ported out my number to another company, but bc i did that they wont unleash my phone til end of ...
  • Pymm West: Sounds just like ATT. They do anything they want or don't want to do. If you don't like it where you going to go. Why in the world did the feds allow ...
  • Pymm West: Nice article, I learned some things about Wildblue I didn't know. For instance QMT allowances. Never heard anything about that from Wildblue techs, no...
  • Satori vonFaust: Here's my story - Been an AT&T internet customer (due to limited choices in my area) for several years first with wireless DSL (the laptop 'fob') ...
  • D Elefante: Interestingly the callerID for my local calls come up w/ 7 digits. It irritates my wife who uses the phone's memory to callback, and low and behold V...
  • Lorna: It just keeps getting more ridiculous. Now Rogers customer relations and support see my name in caller ID and just hang up. Ok - I am totally on b...
  • Bob: I spoke to Bell today. Was told they no longer sell wireless service to my location (rural Caledon) and they offer NO alternative, not even dialup sin...
  • David Young: David says: Just received the two clearcast antennas I purchased today. When placing my order, the sales rep. said a two year warranty was only $...
  • da1beast: how do i sing up?...
  • Alex Perrier: Canadians have this too in the National Capital, and we got used to it. i barely remember the days of dialing seven numbers instead of ten!...

Your Account: