Home » Broadband "Shortage" »Internet Overcharging » Currently Reading:

Questioning The Coming Internet Clog – “No Reason To Fear Network Capacity Shortages”

Phillip Dampier August 7, 2008 Broadband "Shortage", Internet Overcharging No Comments

One of the nation’s top authorities on global Internet traffic growth says his latest data show no reason to fear network capacity shortages, as traffic growth may even be slightly decelerating.

An article published Tuesday in Telephony Online carries new evidence that the so-called “bandwidth crisis” may be based more on fear than reality.

Professor Andrew Odlyzko, director of the University of Minnesota’s Interdisciplinary Digital Technology Center, released a report last week charting the growth in Internet traffic.   Odlyzko concluded that growth continues at predicted levels between 50-60% per year, which is unchanged for at least the past three years.

Odlyzko introduced his research remarking that the “threatened deluge that was supposed to clog the Internet” still has not made any appearance.   In fact, he said, bandwidth rates may in fact be trending downwards.

Proponents of the Network Bandwidth Congestion Crisis theory usually argue that the apocalyptic end of the Internet as we know it will occur either from capacity shortages on the Internet backbone, or because of congestion at the local “last mile” level, between the broadband provider and your home.

But the raw data suggests neither is an impending threat, particularly assuming that broadband providers do not attempt to shortchange stable investment in their networks to meet the demands of their growing customer base.

Broadband providers could engineer a self-fulfilling prophecy of a bandwidth crisis if they reduce their investment in their networks, preferring to take additional profits from the broadband business while cutting costs in order to prop up shareholder return or profitability.   But such moves, which are often uncovered by carefully reviewing required public filings made for shareholder review, would quickly expose the fallacy of the position taken by several bandwidth providers that usage caps are necessary to reduce demand, which could have been met by responsible company practices to maintain and expand their networks to the same historic degree they have done for the last several years.




Share

Other stories of interest:

  1. “Internet Evangelist” Opposes Volume Caps, Limits; “They’re Not Very Useful”
  2. NBC Olympics: On the Go… Somewhere Else
  3. Revisited: Laurel Lane Is The Central Front Of The War On Bandwidth Hogs
  4. Frontier Reveals Plans of Usage Cap Implementation to Employees; Leaves Customers In The Dark Until It’s A Done Deal
  5. FCC Commissioner Regurgitates Industry Talking Points On Demand

Search This Site:

Contributions:

Recent Comments:

  • Loons In June!: Hi Riley nice commercial. Isn't Dish Networks TV everywhere just a slingbox? Or am I mistaken? Oh it is. "Dish will begin taking orders for the Vi...
  • Bill Bishop: Please note that these are the same clowns who sell the Heat Surge (you can bag all the glitz and get a thermostatically controlled 1500 watt heater a...
  • Jack J: Read the ad a little more thouroughly. It does not say you can get 953 channels. It says you can recieve approximatly 53 channels in your local area ...
  • Michelle: Thanks for the article... this ad just ran in Pittsburgh yesterday. Will make sure to forward to others! Many Thanks!...
  • Riley: I’m sure many Time Warner customers are happy that they have the ability to stream some channels to their iPhone. The main issue I see with the app is...
  • Ben: It's a nice app, but it's worthless by being limited to your home network! What's the point? If I'm at home, I'll watch on my TV!!! I like the Remote ...
  • jr: Frontier CEO Mary Agnes Wilderotter received $8,584,002 in total compensation in 2010...
  • DJ: Thanks for getting this out there for others to read, I do appreciate it. I do have some slightly good news though, I might be moving!!! No more Fr...
  • fred: No. Now you need a bare minimum of one gigabit (upload and download) for 21st century broadband. 100 megabits is aiming far too low to be competitive....
  • David: Daniel, That is what I set up via my bionic droid smartphone. A WAP2 that acts as the hotspot for my computer. Currently running 8 mb/s on download...
  • Matt: If they don't like the broadband options that are available, they can start their own WISP. That is how most WISPs started out anyway!...
  • Scott: and who do consumers turn to to get away from metered low cap and high priced WISP's?...

Your Account: